One open primary
All qualified candidates appear together, regardless of party. Any voter may choose up to five candidates they support for each office.
One primary open to every candidate and every voter. Five finalists. A general election where your backup choices count.
Top5 Voting is a proposed two-stage election. It gives every qualified candidate a path onto one primary ballot, then lets voters express both support and preference.
All qualified candidates appear together, regardless of party. Any voter may choose up to five candidates they support for each office.
The five candidates with the most approval votes move on. With one candidate, or if exactly one earns approval from more than half of primary voters, that candidate is elected immediately.
If there is a general election, voters rank the finalists. The last-place candidate is eliminated each round, and those ballots transfer to their next active choice.
Local law sets eligibility. Our recommended starting point is signatures from 1% of the state's registered voters as of January 1 of the election year.
These small examples show the mechanics. The candidates and votes are fictional.
Choose up to five. Each check is one approval. Your ballot joins 10 fictional ballots already cast.
Choose the candidates you support.
The goal is a government that reflects more of us, and a political culture that rewards solving problems together.
What if candidates had to earn support beyond one political tribe?
THE QUESTION BEHIND TOP5 VOTINGOne all-candidate ballot removes the party nomination as the only practical route to the general election. Candidates can build coalitions around ideas.
In a ranked general election, candidates benefit when voters are willing to put them second or third, even across disagreements.
Five finalists can bring more perspectives into the final conversation than a two-candidate contest.
That is party identification in a Gallup survey, not voter registration.
Source: Gallup, Jan. 2026 ↗Our goal is adoption in every eligible local and state election. This first tracker separates the exact proposal from related reforms, and keeps state law distinct from municipal examples.
“Related” means a statewide all-candidate primary or ranked-choice voting for at least some major offices. Local rules are shown separately below.
These examples are a starting set, not a complete census of every municipality. None is labeled an exact Top5 match.
Baseline reviewed September 2026. Rules vary by office and may change. Source set: NCSL primary systems, FairVote RCV jurisdictions, and Alaska Division of Elections.
For drafting: Approval voting can produce more than one candidate above 50%. A tie for the last finalist, general-election ties, and exhausted rankings also need explicit rules.
Our proposal would apply eliminations nationally: in each round, remove the candidate with the fewest current top-choice votes nationwide from every state’s rankings, then recalculate each state’s winner and electoral votes. Continue until a candidate has the electoral majority (currently 270 of 538).
If no candidate reaches the required majority, the Constitution’s contingent-election process applies. A full legal and administrative design must address state elector laws, district allocation in Maine and Nebraska, ties, exhausted ballots, timing, and certification.
National Archives: Electoral College FAQ ↗Change usually begins with a small group asking how elections could work better. Start with the rules where you live, then build a coalition around a clear proposal.
These organizations work on related reforms. Their inclusion does not imply endorsement of this specific proposal.
Pick a state to see its baseline status and a practical first step.